Employee stock ownership plans (“ESOPs”) provide for investment primarily in employer stock and are a means by which employees of publicly traded and closely held companies may acquire tax-favored ownership of company stock.
ERISA’s fiduciary obligations (other than the duty to diversify) govern those who administer ESOP plans and, not surprisingly, the interplay between ESOP administration and management of the company’s business often gives rise to litigation. Companies must also navigate ERISA’s prohibited transaction rules, which prohibit ESOPs from transacting with the company, its officers and directors and any significant shareholders unless the ESOP receives (or pays) “adequate consideration” for the stock. Litigation surrounding ESOPs of closely held companies often relates to whether “adequate consideration” was received or paid for the company’s stock – i.e., whether the stock was properly valued.
Our team regularly counsels employers and ESOP fiduciaries on matters of compliance with federal and state law, and strategies to reduce exposure to liability in the formation and administration of ESOPs. We also regularly defend companies and ESOP fiduciaries in litigation and governmental investigations relating to the establishment, funding, and administration of ESOPs. Recent cases have involved claims that the ESOP fiduciaries caused the ESOP to pay an inflated price for company stock and that corporate decisions allegedly affecting company stock value were a breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the ESOP.
Select examples of our experience litigating ESOP issues include:
Solis v. Webb, eta/.(N.D.Cal.) Represented former company executive and alleged ESOP fiduciary in litigation brought by the Department of Labor challenging the price at which the ESOP purchased company stock, and certain corporate transactions allegedly impacting the value of company stock.
Clarke v. Undeman, eta/.(E.D.Cal.) Defended Valley
Aggregate Transport and an individual fiduciary in this federal class action for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the formation and administration of an ESOP.
Vincent v. Reser (N.D. Cal.)
Represented ESOP sponsor and fiduciaries in litigation alleging breach of fiduciary duty, and prohibited transaction violations based on claims that the ESOP paid more than fair market value for company stock.
Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc. (N.D.Cal.; 9th Cir.)
Currently representing Franklin Resources, Inc. in the
Ninth Circuit in this claim for benefits brought by a former participant in an ESOP that terminated in 1982. Obtained summary judgment in defendant’s favor.
If you'd like to know more
For more information regarding this area of the Firm’s practice, please contact Brad Huss.
- IRS Releases Rev. Proc. 2014-61 Addressing FSA and Transportation Benefit Limits for 2015
SONYA M. GORDON, October 2014 — On October 30, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) released its annual inflation adjustment guidance for over 40 federal tax provisions, including annual contribution limits for tax-qualified health flexible spending arrangements (“Health FSAs”) and monthly limits for qualified transportation benefits. These and the other tax adjustment limits were covered in […]READ MORE
- Safe Harbor 401(k) Plans: Additional Windsor Implementation Guidance
On May 15, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Notice 2014-37, providing guidance concerning mid-year amendments to safe-harbor 401(k) and safe-harbor 401(m) plans reflecting the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor, which invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”). Notice 2014-37 follows the April release of Notice 2014-19, […]READ MORE
- New IRS Relief Allows Form 8955-SSA to be Filed Late through the Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program (DFVCP)
The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has provided relief to late annual report filers through Notice 2014-35, which allows the Form 8955-SSA, Annual Registration Statement Identifying Separated Participants With Deferred Vested Benefits, to be filed late without late filing penalties. Prior to the 2009 plan year, the information reported on Form 8955-SSA was filed with […]READ MORE