On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) released its first compliance assistance bulletin under the new presidential administration, Compliance Assistance Release No. 2025-01 (the “New Guidance”), announcing and memorializing EBSA’s revocation of its 2022 guidance cautioning against 401(k) plan investments in cryptocurrencies (Compliance Assistance Release No. 2022-01 (the “Prior Guidance”).
The Prior Guidance was issued by EBSA during the last presidential administration in response to a growing number of firms marketing cryptocurrencies as potential 401(k) plan investment options. Citing concerns that cryptocurrencies may have volatile returns, are subject to an evolving regulatory environment, present unique challenges for participants in making informed investment decisions, and have unique custodial, recordkeeping and valuation concerns, EBSA cautioned plan fiduciaries to exercise “extreme care” before considering adding a cryptocurrency to a 401(k) plan investment menu. Notably, in light of EBSA’s concerns, the Prior Guidance warned plan fiduciaries that EBSA expected to conduct an investigative program aimed at plans offering participant investments in cryptocurrencies and related products. More specifically, EBSA informed 401(k) plan investment fiduciaries permitting cryptocurrency investments that they “should expect to be questioned about how they can square their actions with their duties of prudence and loyalty in light of the [associated] risks . . .” This resulted in an immediate and significant chilling effect on pursuing cryptocurrency offerings in 401(k) Plans.
It comes as little surprise that the new presidential administration is a proponent of cryptocurrency, with Vice President Vance announcing the same day as the release of the New Guidance that “crypto finally has a champion and an ally in the White House… crypto and digital assets… are part of the mainstream economy, and are here to stay.” But what does the New Guidance mean for plan fiduciaries and the prudent analysis they must undertake in considering whether cryptocurrencies are an appropriate 401(k) plan investment options?
The New Guidance focuses on the reference to “extreme care” in the Prior Guidance as a rationale for its revocation, stating that “extreme care” is not a standard found in ERISA, and differs from ordinary fiduciary principles thereunder. Under ERISA, the fiduciary principles describing standards of care are the duties of loyalty and prudence. Specifically, ERISA’s duty of loyalty provides that fiduciaries must act solely in the interest of plan participants and beneficiaries with the exclusive purpose of providing benefits and defraying reasonable plan expenses, and the duty of prudence provides that fiduciaries are to carry out their duties with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence that a prudent person familiar with such matters would use (described by the courts as an expert standard).
The New Guidance emphasizes that the Prior Guidance deviated from EBSA’s “historic neutral approach to investment types and strategies” (e.g., imposing a uniform standard of care for different investments), and that revocation of the Prior Guidance “restores [EBSA’s] historical approach by neither endorsing, nor disapproving of, plan fiduciaries who conclude that the inclusion of cryptocurrency in a plan’s investment menu is appropriate.”
For a responsible 401(k) plan fiduciary, the revocation of the Prior Guidance does not give the green light to add cryptocurrency as an investment option; rather, it simply places cryptocurrency on a level playing field with any other potential investment option. In other words, it removes EBSA’s prior heightened scrutiny of cryptocurrency as a 401(k) plan investment option. This means a potential cryptocurrency investment should be reviewed and vetted by plan fiduciaries in the same manner as any other investment, by conducting a prudent process and adhering to the duty of loyalty. Such process may include analyzing and documenting whether the investment option:
In issuing the New Guidance, EBSA did not dismiss the concerns listed in the Prior Compliance release regarding returns, regulatory development, participant comprehension, and unique custodial, recordkeeping and valuation considerations, which will still present challenges when evaluating cryptocurrencies in the same way as other investment options. However, EBSA was clear that it no longer “disapproves” of cryptocurrency as an investment consideration, and a plan fiduciary’s decision should consider all relevant facts and circumstances and will “necessarily be context specific” (referencing Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. 409, 425 (2014)). In other words, the appropriateness of cryptocurrency as an investment should focus on the specific needs of the plan, the unique characteristics of the population, and the reasonableness of the fiduciaries’ judgment.
In light of these changes, those in charge of plan administration must carefully review the applicable disclosure obligations and work closely with the plan actuary and legal counsel to ensure accurate and timely compliance. Plan fiduciaries that wish to consider cryptocurrency as a potential 401(k) plan investment option should work with their investment advisor to evaluate whether such an investment option is appropriate for their plan, taking into account the relevant facts and circumstances for their plan population, and analyzing the various considerations solely in the interest of plan participants in a prudent manner with a well-documented demonstration of their decision-making process. This should include a process to appropriately monitor the cryptocurrency investment, understand and evaluate the reasonableness of its fees, and assess whether sufficient education on the investment can be provided to the participant population.
If you have questions about the New Guidance, please contact us.
To enhance retirement security and increase transparency, defined benefit plans covered by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) are required to timely furnish an annual funding notice (“AFN”) to participants, beneficiaries, the PBGC and certain other persons for the purposes of enhancing retirement security and increasing transparency by ensuring that workers receive timely and accurate information regarding the funded status of their pension plans. The AFN must disclose certain information regarding the plan’s funded status, as set forth in Section 101(f) of ERISA, including, among other things, the plan’s funded percentage, assets and liabilities, funding and investment policies, and participant and beneficiary demographics.
Recent legislative and regulatory developments, including the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”) and the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (“SECURE 2.0”), have significantly updated the AFN requirements, particularly for plans receiving Special Financial Assistance (“SFA”) under ARPA. This article outlines the key changes made to the AFN requirements since the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued its final rule regarding AFN requirements in 2015, as applicable to single-employer plans, multiemployer plans, and multiemployer plans that have received SFA.
Background
Updated AFN requirements for Single-Employer Plans
Under SECURE 2.0, single-employer plans must update their AFN for plan years beginning after December 31, 2023, to comply with the following changes:
Updated AFN requirements for Multiemployer Plans
Under SECURE 2.0, multiemployer plans must update their AFN for plan years beginning after December 31, 2023, to comply with the following changes:
Updated AFN requirements for SFA Multiemployer Plans
The new model AFN does not include language for multiemployer plans that are eligible for or have received SFA. Pending further guidance, plans should continue to comply with FAB 2023-01. FAB 2025-02 provides that the DOL will treat compliance with FAB 2023-01 as constituting a “reasonable, good-faith interpretation” of the AFN requirements with respect to SFA-related disclosures.
FAB 2023-01 provides that multiemployer plans that have received SFA must comply with the following SFA-related disclosure requirements in the AFN:
Conclusion
Recent legislative and regulatory updates have expanded and clarified the information that defined benefit plans must disclose in their AFNs. In light of these changes, those in charge of plan administration must carefully review the applicable disclosure obligations and work closely with the plan actuary and legal counsel to ensure accurate and timely compliance.
Katuri Kaye was Co-Chair of the 2025 Women of CMCP Conference
Mary Powell Presented on “Pharmacy Benefit Manager Process: Roadmap: Health Plan Fiduciary Duties
Brian Murray Presented a “Litigation Update” during the ABA May Tax Meeting
Scott Galbreath Presented on “Retirement Plans for Tax Exempt Organizations” at WP&BC Sacramento
With more than 30 legal professionals practicing solely in employee benefits law, Trucker Huss is one of the largest employee benefits specialty law firms in the country. Our in-depth knowledge and breadth of experience on all issues confronting employee benefit plans, and their sponsors, fiduciaries and service providers, translate into realworld, practical solutions for our clients.
We represent some of the country’s largest companies and union sponsored and TaftHartley trust funds. We also represent mid-sized and smaller employers, benefits consultants and other service providers, including law firms, accountants and insurance brokers.
Since its founding in 1980, Trucker Huss has built its reputation on providing accurate, responsive and personal service. The Firm has grown in part through referrals from our many satisfied clients, including other law firms with which we often partner on a strategic basis to solve client challenges.
Our attorneys serve as officers and governing board members to the country’s premier employee benefits industry associations, and routinely write for their publications and speak at their conferences.
The Trucker Huss Benefits Report is published monthly to provide our clients and friends with information on recent legal developments and other current issues in employee benefits. Back issues of the Benefits Report are posted on the Trucker Huss website (www.truckerhuss.com)
Editor: Nicholas J. White, nwhite@truckerhuss.com
In response to IRS rules of practice, we inform you that any federal tax information contained in this writing cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters in this Benefits Report.
135 Main Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-1815
15760 Ventura Blvd, Suite 910
Los Angeles, California 91436-3019
329 NE Couch St., Suite 200
Portland, Oregon 97232-1332
Tel: (415) 788-3111
Fax: (415) 421-2017
Email: info@truckerhuss.com
Website: www.truckerhuss.com
Copyright © 2025 Trucker Huss. All rights reserved. This newsletter is published as an information source for our clients and colleagues. The articles are current as of the date of publication, are general in nature and are not the substitute for legal advice or opinion in a particular case.
135 Main Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-1815
15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 910
Los Angeles, CA 91436-2964
329 NE Couch Street, Suite 200
Portland, OR 97232-1332
135 Main Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-1815
15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 910
Los Angeles, CA 91436-2964
329 NE Couch Street, Suite 200
Portland, OR 97232-1332