DOL Replaces Q&A 30 Regarding Use of Brokerage Windows

NEWS

August 2012


We reported in our July issue that the Department of Labor ("DOL") had issued a Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB 2012-02) which suggested that:

  • in certain circumstances, plan fiduciaries might have an obligation to look through a brokerage window to monitor investments made by participants through the brokerage window; and

  • a plan fiduciary's failure to designate a manageable number of investment alternatives, for example, to avoid investment disclosures under the regulation, raises questions under ERISA section 404(a)'s general statutory fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty

On Monday, July 30, 2012 the DOL replaced Q&A 30 with a new Q&A 39, and reissued FAB 2012-02 as FAB 2012-02R.

In the new Q&A 39, the DOL makes it clear that a platform or a brokerage window, self-directed brokerage account, or similar plan arrangement in an individual account or DC plan is not a designated investment alternative ("DIA"). The DOL, however, restated its position that:

  • a plan fiduciary might violate its duties of loyalty and prudence by failing to "designate" any plan investment alternatives (perhaps to avoid fee-related disclosures to participants); and

  • fiduciaries have the responsibility to exercise their statutory duties of prudence and loyalty to participants with respect to the nature and quality of services provided in connection with a brokerage window or similar arrangement.

The DOL further stated that it intends to engage in discussions with various interested parties "to help determine how best to assure compliance with these duties in a practical and cost effective manner, including, if appropriate, through amendments of relevant regulatory provisions."

What does this mean?

First, a fiduciary seeking to avoid regulatory disclosure obligations by funneling all plan investments through a brokerage window might be wise to rethink that strategy.

Second, fiduciaries of ERISA-subject individual account or DC plans have, and always have had, a duty to select prudently the investment alternatives made available under the plan, to monitor the performance of those investment alternatives, and to make adjustments where necessary. Thus, the decisions to include a particular type of investment (e.g., mutual funds, annuities or a brokerage window), and to select a particular service provider, fund or other investment option, must be prudent ones. This does not that mean a fiduciary must make the best possible choice. Rather, it means that a fiduciary must engage in a deliberative process when choosing the types of investments, the service providers and the funds made available to participants.

MATTHEW L. GOUAUX




Copyright © Trucker Huss. All rights reserved. This article is published as an information source for our clients and colleagues. The article is current as of the date shown above, is general in nature and is not the substitute for legal advice or opinion in a particular case. In response to new IRS rules of practice, we inform you that any federal tax information contained in this writing cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters in this writing.