The Book on the Roth 401(k) and 403(b) and Why Your Business or Organization Must Have One (maybe)
PENSION BENEFITS
- Eighth Circuit Reinstates 401(k) Plan Fee Lawsuit Against Wal‑Mart
- IRS Issues 2009 Cumulative List
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2010
- IRS Issues Final Regulations under Code Section 436
- Recent IRS Guidance Addresses Contribution of Unused Paid Time Off, Automatic Enrollment and Tax Notices
- Supreme Court Holds that Pension Plan May Apply a Benefit Formula That Treats Pre-Pregnancy Disability Act Pregnancy Leave Less Favorably Than Other Medical Leave
- IRS Issues Guidance on Suspension of Safe Harbor Nonelective Contributions
- Treasury Department Issues Final Regulations on Automatic Enrollment Plans
- Kennedy v. DuPont: The Supreme Court Makes Life a Little Easier for Plan Administrators
- IRS Issues 2008 Cumulative List
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2009
- Heroes Earning Assistance and Relief Tax Act Adds Benefits for Those in Military Service
- Benefits Quiz
- Supreme Court Rules Defined Contribution Plan Participants Can Sue for Losses to Their Individual Accounts
- IRS Issues Guidance for New Distribution Requirements that Become Effective in 2008
- New Multiemployer Plan Disclosure Requirements — ERISA Section 101(k)
- IRS Issues 2007 Cumulative List
- IRS Proposes Regulations Regarding Automatic Contribution Arrangements
- Final Section 403(b) Regulations: What Plan Sponsors Need to Know
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2008
- IRS Issues Final Regulations Affecting Section 403(b) Plans Covering Employees of Tax-Exempt Organizations, Public Schools and Churches
- Treasury Department Issues Final Regulations under Code Section 415
- IRS Updates Procedures for Opinion, Advisory and Determination Letter Applications
- Contacting Missing Plan Participants — Practical Considerations
- 2007 Final Roth 401(k) Regulations: The Latest Chapter
- Public Safety Employees and the Pension Protection Act of 2006
- DOL Issues Interim Final Rule Relating to the Time and Order of Domestic Relations Orders
- Guidance Issued on Deduction of Contributions to Defined Benefit Plans
- IRS Issues Distribution Guidance in Notice 2007–7
- IRS Issues Transitional Guidance Regarding Divestiture Rights and A Model Notice
- New Notices and Disclosures for Plan Sponsors under the PPA
- Cash Balance Plans — A Clearer Future?
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2007
- IRS Finalizes Anti-Cutback
Regulations: Heinz and Utilization Test Included - Internal Revenue Service Updates and Expands the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System
- The Internal Revenue Service Issues a Second Set of Final Regulations Regarding the Disclosure of Relative Values of Optional Forms of Benefit
- The Internal Revenue Service Releases 2005 Cumulative List of Changes
- Two Recent Court Decisions Remind Plans to Exercise Caution in Handling Contested Benefit Claims
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2006
- Relative Value Information Required to Be Included in Certain QJSA Explanations As Early As November 3, 2005
- Treasury Department Issues Proposed Section 415 Regulations
- IRS Issues Proposed Roth 401(k) Regulations
- Revenue Procedure 2005–23 — Internal Revenue Service Guidance for Implementing Heinz Decision
- Use of an Administrative Committee to Address Fiduciary Obligations of a Retirement Plan Sponsor
- 401(k) and 401(m): IRS Issues Final Regulations
- Proposed and Temporary Section 403(b) Regulations of Interest to Tax-Exempt Employers
- Missing Participants
- The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004: Employee Benefits Related Issues
- The Automatic Rollover of Mandatory Cash-Outs: The Department of Labor's Safe Harbor Final Regulations
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2005
- IRS Issues Final 401(a)(9) Minimum Distribution Regulations
- Unanimous Supreme Court Decision Determines That Post-Retirement Plan Amendment Violates ERISA's Anti-Cutback Rule
- PBGC Announces New Participant Notice Voluntary Correction Program
- DOL Addresses Modifications Made to Pre-Existing QDROs
- Revenue Procedure 200425 Extends Remedial Amendment Period Only for Certain Specified Disqualifying Provisions
- New Requirement for Automatic Rollovers of Small Cash-Outs from Qualified Plans: The Proposed Regulations
- IRS Issues Updated Procedures for Waiver of Minimum Funding Standards
- IRS Issues Guidance Clarifying Allocation of Plan Expenses to Inactive Participants
- New Legislation Clarifies Rule on Plan Loans to Servicemembers
- Proposed 401(k) Regulations Include Interesting ESOP Change
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2004
- Recent Court Cases on Cash Balance Plans
- Internal Revenue Service Simplifies and Streamlines the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System
The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) added a new Section 402A to the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") effective January 1, 2006, which provides that 401(k) and 403(b) plans may permit participants to designate some or all of their elective deferrals as Roth contributions. These "designated Roth contributions," unlike pre-tax elective deferrals, are currently includable in income. In turn, "qualified distributions" of designated Roth contributions are excludable from gross income.
In two parts, this article is intended to cover everything you need to know about the Roth 401(k) and 403(b).¹ The first part of this article is directed towards those considering implementing the Roth 401(k) provisions. This section discusses what everyone wants to know—the pros and cons of adopting the Roth 401(k) provisions. Whether you are a plan sponsor or a participant you will be surprised to discover the significant financial value of Roth 401(k)s.
The second part of this article is more technical, and describes the current rules that govern Roth 401(k)s. This includes the tax consequences of contributions and distributions, the rollover rules, reporting requirements, etc. If you have already decided that the Roth 401(k) is in your best interest (or you have already adopted the Roth 401(k) provisions), this section will be a useful resource.
Part I: Why Your Business or Organization Must Have a Roth 401(k) Plan (maybe) The best explanation is by illustration. Assume a 50 year old participant will earn $100,000 in 2006 and, for the sake of simplicity, also assume the marginal tax rate for this participant is 50%. Let's say the participant needs $80,000 for living expenses during the year ($40,000 after taxes) and intends to invest the $20,000 balance. If the participant's plan does not offer the Roth option, the participant would be wise to invest the entire $20,000 as pre-tax contributions (the 2006 402(g) limit of $15,000 plus the 2006 catch-up limit $5,000). If the participant's plan offered the Roth option, the participant could invest $10,000 under the Roth option ($20,000 pay less 50% in taxes equals $10,000).
As long as the participant's marginal tax rate stays the same, the $20,000 pre-tax contribution is IDENTICAL in economic value to the $10,000 Roth contribution. For instance, assume that the participant's investments return 10% in 2006. At the end of 2006, the $20,000 pre-tax contribution grows to $22,000, while the $10,000 Roth contribution grows to $11,000. If the participant takes a distribution of the Roth contribution on January 1, 2007, she will receive the $11,000 tax-free under the Roth rules (please assume for purposes of this illustration that the distribution is a qualified distribution). A distribution of the $22,000 from the pre-tax account on that date also yields $11,000 after applying the tax rate of 50%. The result is the same regardless of how long the contributions remain in the plan, as long as the tax rate stays the same.
Many practitioners argue that the Roth contribution is more valuable only if the participant's marginal tax rate is greater at retirement than in the year of the contribution. For example, assume in our illustration that the participant's marginal tax rate increased to 60% on January 1, 2007. The tax-free Roth distribution of $11,000 would be unaffected by the tax rate increase. However, a distribution of the $22,000 from the pre-tax account would yield only $8,800 to the participant. Conversely, if the tax rate decreased to 40%, the pretax contribution would be seen as a better bet because the participant would receive $13,200 from the pre-tax contribution instead of $11,000 from the Roth.
The overly simple conclusion being reached far and wide is that if you expect your marginal tax rate to increase at retirement, the Roth is your friend, and if you are expecting a decrease, the Roth is your foe.
The reason plan employers should, and eventually will, adopt the Roth provisions is that Roth 401(k)s can be extremely valuable to plan participants. Roth 401(k)s permit plan participants to stash away significantly more money in a defined contribution plan than Code sections 402(g) or 415 currently permit for exclusively pre-tax arrangements.
Hogwash! The Roth Can Be Everybody's Friend The secret of the value to making additional contributions to the plan with outside savings is that money inside a qualified-type retirement plan will always perform better than the same money outside the plan. That's what we are really comparing here—after-tax money inside a plan against our savings outside a plan. At a minimum, your investments inside the plan are never subject to dividend or capital gains tax treatment.
Of course, the benefit under this demonstration is somewhat inflated by the use of a 50% tax rate. But for 2006, participants with a 35% or a 28% marginal tax rate in 2006 can contribute an extra $7,000 or $5,600, respectively. Again, these extra contributions represent an effective increase in the Code section 402(g) and 415 limits for these participants. By utilizing the opportunity to make additional Roth contributions, many participants can be better off economically even if their marginal tax rate decreases at retirement. For those whose marginal tax rate stays the same or increases at retirement, it's a pure windfall.
For a moment, let's go back to assuming that the tax rate in our illustration stays the same. In that case, we just proved that the financial benefit of a $20,000 pretax contribution is identical to a $10,000 Roth contribution. However, what additional opportunity does the Roth account provide? Eureka! Our participant has the opportunity to contribute an additional $10,000 to the Roth account using additional earnings or outside savings. Here's the part most practitioners, service providers, plans and participants have not been alerted to: if $10,000 in Roth contributions are identical to $20,000 in pre-tax contributions, then $20,000 in Roth contributions are identical to $40,000 in regular pretax contributions! That amounts to a $20,000 increase in the Code section 402(g) limit. For 2006, the Code section 415 overall annual contribution limit is $44,000. By fully utilizing the Roth contribution as described above, the participant also has effectively increased the Code section 415 limit by $20,000, to $64,000. This participant may receive up to $24,000 in employer contributions in addition to the Roth contributions.
More Benefits to Participants Last but not least, for those interested participants, the Roth offers a valuable estate planning opportunity not available with respect to pre-tax contributions. Roth contributions may be rolled over into a Roth IRA which, unlike a traditional IRA, is not subject to the minimum distribution requirements during the life of the IRA holder. Such a rollover can extend the period during which earnings on Roth contributions may accumulate tax free well beyond the time limit for deferring pre-tax contributions.
Even participants who cannot utilize the opportunity to make the additional Roth contributions discussed above can benefit, by simply substituting their available Roth contributions for their pre-tax contributions, if they believe their marginal tax rate will increase at retirement. Likely candidates are participants at an early or middle stage in their careers who have a reasonable expectation that their annual income, and therefore their tax rate, will increase by the time they retire. For participants who may be less clear about their retirement strategy, the Roth offers an opportunity to hedge against the risk of escalating tax rates.
What's the Catch? If that weren't enough for some employers to handle, under the so-called "EGTRRA Sunset," the provisions of EGTRRA are scheduled to expire for years beginning after December 31, 2010. If the Roth provisions are not renewed, there may be additional costs associated with dismantling the entire process that could equal the costs of implementation.
There may also be some disadvantages to participants. Those who are fairly certain that their tax rate will be significantly lower at retirement, perhaps because they are nearing the end of their careers, may not benefit. Also, for participants who cannot make the additional Roth contributions discussed above because they wish to maintain their current take home pay, Roth contributions may result in lower matching contributions. For example, assume a 20% tax rate for a participant who will earn $50,000 in 2006. If he needs $45,000 in living expenses for the year, he can contribute $5,000 pre-tax or $4,000 as a Roth contribution ($5,000 less 20% is $4,000). If the contributions are matched at 50%, the pre-tax contributions garner the participant a $2,500 match, while the Roth contributions earn him only a $2,000 match. Moreover, the current deduction for pre-tax contributions is a "sure thing," while there's no guarantee that in the future Congress will not decide to tax distributions of Roth contributions (long ago, Social Security benefits were tax-free).
Although it appears that there are significant benefits associated with the Roth, a cost-benefit analysis must be performed when an employer considers implementing the Roth provisions, or when a participant considers making Roth contributions. Because each situation is unique, we strongly encourage employers and participants to discuss their situation with their tax and/or financial advisor before making any decisions concerning the Roth contributions. If you are an employer grappling with these issues give us a call and we will be glad to guide you through the analysis.
Like many things in life, the benefits are not without cost. Potential employer costs include expenses associated with:
Part II: The Book on the Roth 401(k)
Roth 401(k) and 403(b) accounts are governed by Code section 402A, and the final and temporary regulations issued under that and related Code sections.
Statutory Provisions Also, a qualified distribution may not be made before the earlier of the 5th taxable year of the participant following the participant's first contribution under the plan or, if a Roth rollover contribution was made to the plan from a designated Roth account previously established for the participant under another plan, the first taxable year for which the participant made a designated Roth contribution to that previously established account. For example, if a participant makes his or her first designated Roth contribution under a plan in 2008, the earliest date a participant can receive a qualified distribution from that plan is January 1, 2013, unless the participant rolled over designated Roth contributions from another plan and those contributions were initially made before 2008. In that case, a qualified distribution may be made in the 5th taxable year following the taxable year in which the participant first made a Roth contribution to the plan from which the rollover originated; if the participant rolled over designated Roth contributions initially made in 2007, a qualified distribution could occur as early as January 1, 2012;
2005 Final Regulations The final regulations maintain the general rules from the proposed regulations and provide that designated Roth contributions must be irrevocably designated as such, in lieu of pre-tax contributions, and treated as includable in gross income at the time the participant would have received cash but for the contribution election. The final regulations maintain the rule from the proposed regulations that permits a highly compensated employee with elective contributions for a year that include both pre-tax contributions and designated Roth contributions to elect whether excess contributions are to be attributed to the pre-tax contributions or designated Roth contributions. The final regulations also retain the rule that a distribution of excess contributions is not includible in gross income to the extent it represents a distribution of designated Roth contributions. However, the income (i.e., earnings) allocable to a corrective distribution of excess contributions that are designated Roth contributions is includible in gross income in the same manner as income allocable to a corrective distribution of excess contributions that are pre-tax contributions.
In addition, the final regulations clarify that: The preamble to the final regulations adds the following: The final regulations are generally applicable for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2006. 2006 Proposed Regulations TAXATION OF DISQUALIFYING DISTRIBUTIONS AND RELATED ISSUES
In General
The proposed regulations make clear that designated Roth contributions are treated as a separate contract under the rules of Code section 72 and disqualifying distributions are taxed in accordance with the rules under Code section 72. As a result, the portion of any distribution that is includible in income as an amount allocable to income on the contract and the portion not includible in income as an amount allocable to investment in the contract (basis) are determined in the same proportion that designated Roth contributions and earnings bear to the total designated Roth account in the plan. For example, if a participant has $20,000 in her designated Roth account consisting of $15,000 of designated Roth contributions and $5,000 of earnings, a disqualifying distribution of $8,000 would consist of $6,000 of designated Roth contributions that would not be includible in income and $2,000 of earnings that would be includible in income.
In addition, a participant may have only one separate contract for purposes of Code section 72 under a plan. However, additional separate accounts may be established for an alternate payee under a QDRO or different beneficiaries after the death of a participant.
Rollover of Designated Roth Contributions REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS ADDITIONAL ISSUES CONCERNING ROTH IRAS: AMOUNTS THAT CAN NOT BE QUALIFIED DISTRIBUTIONS:
Certain kinds of distributions that are described in Treasury Regulation section 1.402(c)-2, A-4, are not eligible rollover distributions. Because these amounts must be currently included in income when distributed, the proposed regulations provide that these amounts cannot be qualified (tax-free) distributions from a designated Roth account. These amounts include: DISTRIBUTION OF EXCESS DEFERRALS AND GAP INCOME: DISTRIBUTION OF EMPLOYER SECURITIES DESIGNATED ROTH ACCOUNTS UNDER SECTION 403(B) PLANS: EFFECTIVE DATES:
The 2006 proposed regulations are generally effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2007. However, many of the provisions are proposed to be effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2006, including the prohibition against transferring value between designated Roth accounts and other accounts under a plan, the rules relating to excess deferrals, the rollover rules, and the rules relating to Roth IRAs. The rules under 403(b) will likely be effective January 1, 2007, but no earlier than the date the 2004 proposed regulations under Code section 403(b) are finalized. Most importantly, plans and participants are authorized to rely on the proposed regulations.
Note: Under Notice 2005-95, the deadline to adopt an amendment implementing designated Roth contributions is the end of the plan year in which the plan amendment is effective.
If you have any questions about these rules, or the manner in which a plan may be amended to incorporate the Roth provisions, give us a call and we would be glad to assist you.
_____________________________
¹ Although this article discusses the Roth primarily in terms of the 401(k) plan, the Roth 401(k) and 403(b) are very similar. The few differences between them are discussed in the second section of this article.
Code section 402A provides that:
On March 02, 2005, the IRS issued guidance on the Roth 401 rules in the form of proposed regulations. [See our May 2005 issue for an overview of the proposed regulations.] On December 30, 2005, the IRS issued final regulations on the requirements applicable to designated Roth contributions under a 401(k) plan ("final regulations"). The final regulations are consistent with, and clarify in small measure, the proposed regulations.
On January 26, 2006, the IRS issued proposed regulations (mostly in Q&A format) concerning:
Copyright © 2006 Trucker Huss. All rights reserved. This article is published as an information source for our clients and colleagues. The article is current as of the date shown above, is general in nature and is not the substitute for legal advice or opinion in a particular case. In response to new IRS rules of practice, we inform you that any federal tax information contained in this writing cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters in this writing.

