New Legislation Clarifies Rule on Plan Loans to Servicemembers
PENSION BENEFITS
- Eighth Circuit Reinstates 401(k) Plan Fee Lawsuit Against Wal‑Mart
- IRS Issues 2009 Cumulative List
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2010
- IRS Issues Final Regulations under Code Section 436
- Recent IRS Guidance Addresses Contribution of Unused Paid Time Off, Automatic Enrollment and Tax Notices
- Supreme Court Holds that Pension Plan May Apply a Benefit Formula That Treats Pre-Pregnancy Disability Act Pregnancy Leave Less Favorably Than Other Medical Leave
- IRS Issues Guidance on Suspension of Safe Harbor Nonelective Contributions
- Treasury Department Issues Final Regulations on Automatic Enrollment Plans
- Kennedy v. DuPont: The Supreme Court Makes Life a Little Easier for Plan Administrators
- IRS Issues 2008 Cumulative List
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2009
- Heroes Earning Assistance and Relief Tax Act Adds Benefits for Those in Military Service
- Benefits Quiz
- Supreme Court Rules Defined Contribution Plan Participants Can Sue for Losses to Their Individual Accounts
- IRS Issues Guidance for New Distribution Requirements that Become Effective in 2008
- New Multiemployer Plan Disclosure Requirements — ERISA Section 101(k)
- IRS Issues 2007 Cumulative List
- IRS Proposes Regulations Regarding Automatic Contribution Arrangements
- Final Section 403(b) Regulations: What Plan Sponsors Need to Know
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2008
- IRS Issues Final Regulations Affecting Section 403(b) Plans Covering Employees of Tax-Exempt Organizations, Public Schools and Churches
- Treasury Department Issues Final Regulations under Code Section 415
- IRS Updates Procedures for Opinion, Advisory and Determination Letter Applications
- Contacting Missing Plan Participants — Practical Considerations
- 2007 Final Roth 401(k) Regulations: The Latest Chapter
- Public Safety Employees and the Pension Protection Act of 2006
- DOL Issues Interim Final Rule Relating to the Time and Order of Domestic Relations Orders
- Guidance Issued on Deduction of Contributions to Defined Benefit Plans
- IRS Issues Distribution Guidance in Notice 2007–7
- IRS Issues Transitional Guidance Regarding Divestiture Rights and A Model Notice
- New Notices and Disclosures for Plan Sponsors under the PPA
- Cash Balance Plans — A Clearer Future?
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2007
- IRS Finalizes Anti-Cutback
Regulations: Heinz and Utilization Test Included - Internal Revenue Service Updates and Expands the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System
- The Internal Revenue Service Issues a Second Set of Final Regulations Regarding the Disclosure of Relative Values of Optional Forms of Benefit
- The Book on the Roth 401(k) and 403(b) and Why Your Business or Organization Must Have One (maybe)
- The Internal Revenue Service Releases 2005 Cumulative List of Changes
- Two Recent Court Decisions Remind Plans to Exercise Caution in Handling Contested Benefit Claims
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2006
- Relative Value Information Required to Be Included in Certain QJSA Explanations As Early As November 3, 2005
- Treasury Department Issues Proposed Section 415 Regulations
- IRS Issues Proposed Roth 401(k) Regulations
- Revenue Procedure 2005–23 — Internal Revenue Service Guidance for Implementing Heinz Decision
- Use of an Administrative Committee to Address Fiduciary Obligations of a Retirement Plan Sponsor
- 401(k) and 401(m): IRS Issues Final Regulations
- Proposed and Temporary Section 403(b) Regulations of Interest to Tax-Exempt Employers
- Missing Participants
- The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004: Employee Benefits Related Issues
- The Automatic Rollover of Mandatory Cash-Outs: The Department of Labor's Safe Harbor Final Regulations
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2005
- IRS Issues Final 401(a)(9) Minimum Distribution Regulations
- Unanimous Supreme Court Decision Determines That Post-Retirement Plan Amendment Violates ERISA's Anti-Cutback Rule
- PBGC Announces New Participant Notice Voluntary Correction Program
- DOL Addresses Modifications Made to Pre-Existing QDROs
- Revenue Procedure 2004–25 Extends Remedial Amendment Period Only for Certain Specified Disqualifying Provisions
- New Requirement for Automatic Rollovers of Small Cash-Outs from Qualified Plans: The Proposed Regulations
- IRS Issues Updated Procedures for Waiver of Minimum Funding Standards
- IRS Issues Guidance Clarifying Allocation of Plan Expenses to Inactive Participants
- Proposed 401(k) Regulations Include Interesting ESOP Change
- Pension Plan Limitations for 2004
- Recent Court Cases on Cash Balance Plans
- Internal Revenue Service Simplifies and Streamlines the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System
On December 19, 2003, President Bush signed the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (the "SCRA") which restates, clarifies, revises and renames the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940. In general, the SCRA temporarily suspends legal proceedings and transactions of individuals entering military service so that they may devote their entire energy to the defense needs of the United States. This article focuses only on the SCRA provision imposing a 6% maximum limit on the interest rate charged to a servicemember for a loan. This interest rate cap is important to plan sponsors because the Department of Labor (the "DOL") has taken the position that the cap extends to plan loans. (See the DOL’s Frequently Asked Questions for Reservists Being Called to Active Duty at www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs ). The following summarizes the SCRA rules for the interest rate cap as applied to plan loans.
Military Service RequirementThe SCRA provides relief to members of the uniformed services (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and Coast Guard) who are on active duty, or in the case of a member of the National Guard, service under a call to active duty for a period of more than 30 consecutive days (Section 101(2)).
Servicemember Must Provide NoticeThe 6% interest rate is not automatically applied by the plan. To obtain the 6% rate, a servicemember must provide the plan with written notice and a copy of the military orders calling the servicemember to military service. The notice must be provided no later than 180 days after the date of the servicemember’s termination or release from military service (Section 207(b)(1)).
The Limit Is Retroactive to the First Date of Military ServiceOnce a plan receives timely notice from a servicemember, the interest rate limit is effective as of the date the servicemember was called to military service for the duration of the military service (Section 207(b)(2)).
Limit Only Applies to Pre-service LoansThe 6% interest rate limit only applies to a loan that was made prior to the date the participant entered military service. Therefore, the interest rate for a plan loan to a participant while on active military duty may be determined under the plan’s normal loan policy (Section 207(a)(1)).
Interest in Excess of 6% Is ForgivenThe plan must forgive, not merely postpone, the interest in excess of 6% (Section 207(a)(2)).
Interest Includes Service Charges and FeesFor purposes of calculating the 6% interest limit, the term "interest" includes service charges, renewal charges, fees, or any other charges (except bona fide insurance) with respect to the loan (Section 207(d)).
Plan Administrator May Petition Court to Retain Higher Interest RateA court may grant a creditor relief to retain the higher interest rate if it determines that the servicemember’s
military service does not materially affect the servicemember’s ability to pay the higher rate. At this time, there is no authority regarding the extent to which ERISA obligates plan fiduciaries to investigate the "material affect" of a servicemember’s military service on his or her ability to repay a plan loan or the circumstances under which the plan must petition a court to retain a higher interest rate (Section 207(c)).
Interaction with Loan SuspensionA plan may provide that a participant’s loan repayments are suspended during the participant’s military service. However, the interaction between the loan suspension and the SCRA is unclear. For example, one might argue that military service does not materially affect a participant’s ability to repay a loan if the participant’s loan repayment obligation was suspended. However, until there is further authoritative guidance, the plan administrator would have to petition the court to make that determination.
Please feel free to contact us if you have questions about the SCRA or the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA"), which also imposes special rules on plans regarding participants who leave for military service.
Copyright © 2006 Trucker Huss. All rights reserved. This article is published as an information source for our clients and colleagues. The article is current as of the date shown above, is general in nature and is not the substitute for legal advice or opinion in a particular case. In response to new IRS rules of practice, we inform you that any federal tax information contained in this writing cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters in this writing.