California Repeals Senior COBRA Program
HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS
- HHS Issues Additional Transitional Reinsurance Fee Guidance
- Health Care Reform and Wellness Programs: Protecting Participants and Giving Employers more Flexibility
- Reinsurance Fees for Health Plans—Add These to Your 2014 Budget!
- Health Care Reform after the Election: New Proposed Regulations Address PPACA’s Essential Health Benefits and Minimum Value Requirements
- Additional Medicare Tax Takes Effect January 1, 2013
- Agencies Issue Guidance on Determining Full-Time Employee Status and the Maximum 90-Day Waiting Period under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- IRS Issues Guidance on Comparative Effectiveness Fee under PPACA
- MEDICAL LOSS RATIO REBATES — What's an Employer to Do When the Check is in the Mail?
- Things to Consider in Preparing for Compliance with PPACA
- The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Makes Strange Bedfellows — Chief Justice Roberts Casts the Swing Vote Upholding the Individual Mandate
- Additional Guidance on Summaries of Benefits and Coverage
- Supreme Court Hears Arguments on the Constitutionality of the Individual Mandate
- Final Regulations Issued for the Summary of Benefits and Coverage, Uniform Glossary and Notice of Modification Required Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- IRS Updates Its Guidance on Form W-2 Reporting of Employer-Sponsored Health Coverage
- New Amendments to the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance
- Proposed Regulations Issued on the Summary of Benefits and Coverage and Uniform Glossary that Are Required to Be Provided by March 23, 2012
- Claims and Appeals Rules for Non-Grandfathered Health Plans Amended
- The Affordable Care Act — What's Ahead for Year Two?
- Good News for Plan Sponsors: The DOL and IRS Issue More PPACA Guidance
- PPACA Claims and Appeals Procedures Pack a Punch for Non-Grandfathered Health Plans
- Simple Cafeteria Plans
- Interim Final Regulations Issued Pertaining to Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Dollar Limits on Benefits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections under the Affordable Care Act
- Grandfathered Plan Status — Is it Real, or Just an Illusion?
- New Interim Final Rule on Requirement to Provide Health Plan Coverage to Adult Children
- Early Retiree Reinsurance Program
- A TWIST ON HEALTHCARE REFORM — Five Changes To Consider Now!
- Department of Labor Issues New COBRA Model Notices and COBRA Subsidy Fact Sheet to Reflect TEA Changes
- Historic Health Care Reform Legislation Signed by President Obama
- They're Finally Here — Interim Final Regulations for Compliance with the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008
- 2009 Health and Welfare Plan Compliance Checklist
- GINA Interim Final Regulations Issued — Wellness Programs Impacted
- READY, SET, COMPLY! — New HIPAA Security Breach Notification Rules Require Prompt Action by Covered Entities
- Update on Discretionary Clauses in Disability Insurance Policies in California and Their Impact on ERISA Plans
- COBRA Premium Reduction Guidance — What Do We Do Now?
- Significant HIPAA Changes Imposed by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
- Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 — Impact on Group Health Plans
- Ninth Circuit Denies Petition for Rehearing En Banc in Golden Gate Restaurant Association v. City and County of San Francisco
- New COBRA Subsidy Available Under Stimulus Package
- Massachusetts Issues Final Regulations Establishing Minimum Creditable Coverage Standards
- Ninth Circuit Holds San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance is Not Preempted by ERISA
- New Genetic Nondiscrimination Act Creates Restrictions for Health Plans, Insurers and Employers
- New Leave Entitlements for Military Reasons Added to Family and Medical Leave Act
- Ninth Circuit Lets San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance Take Effect
- IRS Issues New Proposed Section 125 Cafeteria Plan Regulations
- Recent Court Decision Paves Way for Coordination of Retiree Health Benefits with Medicare Benefits — AARP v. EEOC
- New Rules for HSAs
- Final Regulations on HIPAA Nondiscrimination Provisions and Wellness Programs
- New Guidance on the Use of Electronic Payment Cards for Health FSAs, HRAs and DCAPs
- Supreme Court's Sereboff Opinion Clarifies "Equitable Relief" Under ERISA
- Continuing Notice Obligations Under Medicare Part D
- Section 125 Plan 2½ Month Grace Period: Participants’ Bonus and Administrators’ Bane
- CMS Issues Final Regulations
on Medicare Part D - HIPAA Portability Regulations Finalized
- Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003: Retiree Prescription Drug Coverage
- The Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004: Changes to Tax Rules for Health and Accident Coverage and to Other Employee Benefits
- Recent Guidance on Health Savings Accounts
- Discretionary Clauses in Disability Insurance Policies Ruled Illegal in California
- The U.S. Department of Labor Issues Final Regulations Regarding COBRA Notices
- Ninth Circuit Holds that Health Plan Reimbursement and Subrogation Provisions are Enforceable Under State Law
- Getting Serious About Security:
Final HIPAA Security Regulations - Health Savings Accounts the New Tax-Favored Vehicle for the Payment of Health Care Expenses
- Electronic Cards Permitted for Health Flexible Spending Accounts and Health Reimbursement Arrangements
- California Mandates Pay or Play Health Coverage
- Supreme Court Reverses Ninth Circuit’s Adoption of the Treating Physician Rule
- IRS Permits Reimbursement for Certain Non-Prescription Medicines and Drugs
On June 23, 2004, Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law legislation repealing the Senior COBRA program in California. After January 1, 2005, terminating employees and their spouses will not be able to extend their health care coverage through Senior COBRA once federal or Cal-COBRA is exhausted. Older workers may instead be eligible for guaranteed individual health care coverage under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA").
Senior COBRA at a Glance Senior COBRA, codified at California Health and Safety Code section 1373.621 and California Insurance Code section 10116.5, currently provides former employees, their spouses, and former spouses rights to continued medical coverage after federal or Cal-COBRA coverage ends. The cost to the terminating employee cannot exceed 213% of the regular premium. To qualify for Senior COBRA, a terminating employee must:
Only eligible employees who meet these requirements before January 1, 2005 may obtain Senior COBRA coverage in California. Senior COBRA continues for five years, or until the earliest of the following events occurs:
AB 254: The End of Senior COBRA Congress passed HIPAA on August 21, 1996. Under HIPAA?s individual market rules states had two options: (1) follow the federal provisions or, (2) implement an alternative mechanism to provide individuals with coverage at least comparable to HIPAA?s. California enacted legislation in 2000, effective the following year, Page 3 ? August 2004 conforming to HIPAA?s individual market reforms. After the HIPAA portability rules were adopted, concern developed that health care costs under Senior COBRA, which was enacted prior to HIPAA, could be greater than those under HIPAA. However, because older workers were required to use up all COBRA and Cal-COBRA coverage before becoming eligible for HIPAA, older employees in California had no choice but to elect and exhaust Senior COBRA first.
The California State Assembly passed AB 254 in an effort to provide retirees with affordable continuation coverage during the transition between retirement and eligibility for Medicare. The bill?s goal in eliminating Senior COBRA coverage was to give qualifying individuals the same "guaranteed issue" rights under HIPAA in the individual market as other Californians, so the elderly could access more affordable health insurance. Beginning in 2005, seniors leaving their jobs must only use up COBRA and/or Cal-COBRA, not the potentially longer Senior COBRA, before becoming eligible for health insurance under HIPAA.
HIPAA "Guaranteed Issue" HIPAA includes specific protections for employees leaving their jobs or changing jobs by requiring insurers to offer policies to individuals who are not eligible for COBRA, or have already exhausted their COBRA coverage. HIPAA requires all health insurance issuers offering coverage to individuals to accept any "federally eligible individuals" who apply for coverage. A federally eligible individual:
Under HIPAA, a health insurance issuer cannot reject an individual?s application if the individual is federally eligible, agrees to pay the required premiums and lives inside the health plan?s service area. An eligible individual does not need to show evidence of insurability, and cannot be excluded from health coverage due to pre-existing conditions. Coverage must be renewed at the individual?s option unless he or she does not pay the required premiums, commits fraud or misrepresentation, moves out of the plan?s service area, or the health plan withdraws from the individual health plan market.
HIPAA?s guaranteed availability requirements do not apply in a state that implements an alternative mechanism which provides federally eligible individuals access to individual health insurance without preexisting condition exclusions. The majority of states, including California, currently implement alternative mechanisms.
California's Alternative Mechanism California Health and Safety Code section 1366.35 and California Insurance Code section 10785 guarantee federally eligible individuals the right to buy coverage from any insurer selling individual coverage. Insurers may limit an individual?s choices to two policies -- either the insurer?s two most popular policies or two representative policies. An insurer offering two representative policies must provide a selection of a policy with a high benefit package and one with a low benefit package. If a person does not meet the federally eligible individual definition, insurers have the right to turn him or her down due to health status or other factors.
California legislation regulates HIPAA coverage and rates. For health care service plan contracts offered through an HMO or a non-PPO health insurer, federally eligible individuals between the ages of 60 to 64 cannot be charged more than 170% of the standard premium charged to an individual who is 59 years of age and resides in the same geographic area. Carriers are also limited to one rate increase per year.
Similar rate protection extends to individuals covered under conversion coverage mandated by the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, California Health and Safety Code sections 1373.1, 1373.2, and 1373.6, and California Insurance Code section 10126. Generally, individuals who lose group health care coverage have the right to continue their coverage with the same insurer under an individual plan after they have exhausted COBRA and Cal-COBRA. Individuals must elect conversion coverage within 63 days of the date their COBRA or Cal-COBRA coverage ended. A health plan may deny an individual application if the individual?s coverage under the group contract was less than three months, or if the individual is already covered by or eligible for Medicare. Individual Conversion Coverage offers special protections so that individuals do not need to show evidence of insurability, and cannot be excluded due to pre-existing conditions exclusions.
For further information, Georgetown University Health Policy Institute?s "A Consumer?s Guide to Getting and Keeping Health Insurance," www.healthinsurance info.net provides a summary of consumer rights and protections in all 50 states.
Copyright © 2006 Trucker Huss. All rights reserved. This article is published as an information source for our clients and colleagues. The article is current as of the date shown above, is general in nature and is not the substitute for legal advice or opinion in a particular case. In response to new IRS rules of practice, we inform you that any federal tax information contained in this writing cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters in this writing.

